ProPublica – Debunking Rationales for Mass Surveillance

ProPublica has published an analysis of the four most often cited rationales offered to justify mass surveillance and collection of metadata, describing why they are “questionable claims.”

It is instructive reading for anyone who is concerned about claims that security cannot be achieved without sacrificing constitutional principles.

Whatever the right answer to that dilemma, official dissembling does little to advance either goal, or to justify public confidence that the government’s decisions are defensible.

ProPublica: Four Questionable Claims Obama Has Made on NSA Surveillance

About Blog of the National Coalition Against Censorship

Blogging Censorship is where National Coalition Against Censorship staff weigh in on the censorship issues on their minds.
This entry was posted in Joan Bertin: Author and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to ProPublica – Debunking Rationales for Mass Surveillance

  1. Pingback: Podcast: Outsourcing Labor, Injuries to the Growing Temp Industry – ProPublica | euzicasa

  2. Pingback: The Alliance Against Mass Surveillance | The Leather Library

  3. Pingback: Senator Cites ‘Serious Concerns,’ Demands National Quality Forum Records – ProPublica (“WHAT AFFORDABLE TO BOVIS, IS NOT AFFORDABLE TO OVIS….BUT THEN BOVIS IS FULLY AWARE…” ) | euzicasa

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s