Our ever more private public spaces

The latest billboard controversy, around the removal of a billboard paid for by a Texas anti-abortion group from an advertising space in SoHo, owned by Lamar Advertising, comes as no surprise. In 2006 Lamar refused to run photographs by Polish artist Karolina Bregula that show same-sex couples holding hands. The photographs were to be displayed as part of a Real Art Ways’ show of contemporary polish art. At least Lamar has no ideological bias – they just censor anything that is controversial…

Lamar owns 151,000 billboards around the United States. An even larger giant, Clear Channel Communications, owns over 200,000 advertising display faces (in their own words) in the U.S. and over 700,000 displays in over 45 countries across 5 continents.  Clear Channel Spectacolor is the premiere operator of more than 50% of outdoor advertising displays in the Times Square area of New York City. And, yes, they censor too. In 2004 Clear Channel reneged on a deal with Berkeley-based Project Billboard to put up an anti-war image in Times Square during the republican National Convention. The company called the image “distasteful” and “politically charged.” A year later, in 2005, the company rejected a billboard protesting Walmart from a Staten Island location.

But that is not where it ends, in 2008, the third giant of billboard advertising,  CBS Outdoor, canceled a contract to display a public art project on five billboards in Minneapolis and St. Paul during the RNC. The billboards, part of her “Soldiers Billboard Project,” would have shown soldiers facing the viewer, with their heads positioned on a table, as if at rest. The pose suggests vulnerability, a trait in direct opposition to public perceptions of those in the armed forces. CBS Outdoor were concerned that some might misinterpret the billboards’ message and see them as disrespectful.

The examples go on and on. These three large companies plus a handful of others others own the bulk of public displays in the U.S., not only billboards, but digital displays, street furniture, space on vehicles, etc. We are barraged by advertising as we drive and as we walk and the content of that advertising is controlled by a few large corporations.

The private ownership of public space in the shape of billboards makes us hostage to a company’s ideological prejudices or its fear of alienating a particular constituency. Selling phones or cars is usually just as lucrative as selling space to those who want to promote their ideas, and less controversial: so why not just sell products? Why not, indeed?Private companies have the constitutional right to censor to their heart’s content, they can decide to just sell cars rather than give space to public conversations about war.

Yet there is something wrong with this picture: we are herded along freeways asked to buy and buy and rarely to think, we walk through city streets in a cacophony of the same messages, increasingly alienated because what we really care about is absent from our visual environment, increasingly unhappy as we realize we will never be that blissful couple on its dream Caribbean beach… It is time to re-think the meaning of public space and what we are giving up when we are surrendering it to the control of corporations impervious to First Amendment imperatives and indifferent to anything but the bottom line.

About Blog of the National Coalition Against Censorship

Blogging Censorship is where National Coalition Against Censorship staff weigh in on the censorship issues on their minds.
This entry was posted in Svetlana Mintcheva: Author and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Our ever more private public spaces

  1. Paul Cardwell says:

    “I think that I shall never see
    A billboard lovely as a tree.
    In fact, unless the billboards fall,
    I’ll never see a tree at all.
    Ogden Nash

  2. I believe billboards are located on private property and people may say or not say almost whatever they like and all in accordance with zoning and other regulation. Had the title of this post been, “Our ever more public private spaces,” the answer would have been readily apparent.

    “The private ownership of public space….” Huh? That’s an impossibility.

    “It is time to re-think the meaning of public space and what we are giving up when we are surrendering it to the control of corporations impervious to First Amendment imperatives and indifferent to anything but the bottom line.” What? It’s private space, not public space. Nothing’s being “surrender[ed] … to the control of corporations.” It’s called real estate, private property ownership. Are you suggesting an end to private property ownership?

    • Billboards dot our freeways – which are public spaces; they surround us when we are walking in the street – again, a public space. In every big city we are under constant barrage of messages to which we are a passive audience. The problem is that, even though these messages constantly intrude on our public spaces, the public interest is not what drives their selection. Perhaps, the way government used to control the limited resource of the airwaves (and still does though not in the same way), it should also control the limited space around us and make sure messages that carry ideas should be protected. And, yes, much to the horror of Safelibraries, I will suggest that more billboard space be kept for public non-profit use because we are (still, I believe) citizens before we are consumers.

      • I must say I’m shocked to hear this from the NCAC. Maybe it should be the NCACC, for National Coalition Against Certain Censorship. I’ll give the NCAC the benefit of the doubt that this blog post’s writer does not understand the law in this particular matter. No harm in that. Pobody’s nerfect.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s