First Amendment upheld in US v Stevens

In a much anticipated decision, the Supreme Court yesterday struck down a federal statute making it a crime to create, sell or possess “a depiction of animal cruelty.” In the 8 – 1 opinion, the Court characterized the law as “a criminal prohibition of alarming breadth,” because of its potential to criminalize a vast array of legally protected expression, including hunting videos and pictures of animals being slaughtered. Justice Alito dissented.

The majority rejected the Government’s argument that free speech rights should be judged by a “balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs,” calling the proposition “startling and dangerous.” Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Court, held that “the First Amendment itself reflects a judgment … that the benefits of its restrictions on the Government outweigh the costs.”

The Government “has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter or its content.” The Court sharply rebuffed the government’s suggestion that “prosecutorial discretion” would save hunters, photographers, magazine publishers and others from prison, saying, “the First Amendment protects against the Government; it does not leave us at the mercy of noblesse oblige. We would not uphold an unconstitutional statute merely because the government promised to use it responsibly.”

Although adopted with good intentions, the law ignored long-standing First Amendment principles. As we’ve said before, in this country we punish conduct, not expression. Animal cruelty is already a crime in all 50 states, and nothing in this opinion will help the Michael Vicks of the world.

About Blog of the National Coalition Against Censorship

Blogging Censorship is where National Coalition Against Censorship staff weigh in on the censorship issues on their minds.
This entry was posted in 1 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to First Amendment upheld in US v Stevens

  1. Guided Hunts says:

    Hunting is not a sport. In a sport, both sides should know they’re in the game. Paul Rodriguez

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s