Update on student speech in Pennsylvania

In February, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued contradictory opinions involving online student speech. The losing sides of both Layshock and Blue Mountain are asking the Court to rehear their cases before a full court. Both parties agree that the two opinions, issued the same day, seemingly contradict each other. Even the winning parties agree that the conflicting rulings will confuse both students and administrators on what is and what is not protected speech.

The Court needs to send a clear message that students should not be punished by school officials for their off campus speech. If the Court accepts the parties’ petition, it will rehear the cases before all the judges of the court and issue a new opinion. Stay tuned for more to come…

Read more about the cases here.

About Blog of the National Coalition Against Censorship

Blogging Censorship is where National Coalition Against Censorship staff weigh in on the censorship issues on their minds.
This entry was posted in Kate Wood: Author and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Update on student speech in Pennsylvania

  1. Pingback: Update on student speech in Pennsylvania « Blogging Censorship | Pennsylvania

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s