(In)decent exposure? Nudes in art

from Brian Reed's "Through the Heart of it All" exhibit

Representations of nudes in painting, sculpture, and photography frequently become subject to controversy. The law, however, is clear: simple nudity (that is nudity outside of a sexually explicit situation) has full constitutional protection. (That does not mean that public officials are always aware of this as a current case in Temecula, CA, testifies.)

But what about a live naked person used as an element of an art installation? The NYPD is not sure. Law enforcement went into the Chair and Maiden Gallery in New York last Sunday and asked for the removal from the gallery’s streetfront window of a naked woman enveloped in a mesh made of shark eggs and teeth, beads and clay pipes. Apparently some neighbor complained about the piece. However, when the woman took up her position in the storefront again yesterday, police circled around but did not interfere.

Indeed, the state statute addressing public nudity provides an exception for “any person entertaining or performing in a play, exhibition, show or entertainment.” The statute was referred to in a case involving Spencer Tunick’s photo shoots of public nude installations. In June 2000, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the city could not stop him from staging a mass nude photo shoot below the Williamsburg Bridge. More recently, the city dropped public lewdness charges against a model, Kathleen Neill who ran naked through a gallery in the Met for the purpose of a photo shoot.

The law aside, what’s in a body? We all have them, we feed them, wash them, exercise them, and most of the time use them for purposes unrelated to sex, but, yes, bodies can also give and receive pleasure. But why all the shame and the concern that children may be around? When someone wants to censor a nude I always wonder about their own dirty thoughts and the shame and guilt that lurks in their own minds.


About Blog of the National Coalition Against Censorship

Blogging Censorship is where National Coalition Against Censorship staff weigh in on the censorship issues on their minds.
This entry was posted in Svetlana Mintcheva: Author and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to (In)decent exposure? Nudes in art

  1. Dr. P. Rapoport says:

    The line “What about the children?” has been used for a long time to cover up adult ignorance, insecurity, and anxiety, in defining and redefining concepts of childhood to suit adults’ agendas. See, for example, Nicola Beisel’s book, Imperiled Innocents, and Anne Higonnet’s book, Pictures of Innocence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s