Nude Sculpture Removed from Public View in Michigan

This week, “Walking Man,” a sculpture of a nude man, was removed from the public space in front of the Anton Art Center in mount Clemens, MI, because of individual complaints. That city officials should respond to the complaints of a few vocal community members by removing an art work from a public space is a disturbing violation of both the artist’s free speech rights and the rights of the public to have access to a wide variety of artistic expression. The personal prejudices of a small minority, who think that representations of human body are shameful, have now been illegitimately imposed on the whole community. Are Mount Clemens officials aware that the Constitution bars them from pandering to the special interest groups and imposing their taste and moral beliefs on the public?

Walking Man by Carl Goines

Walking Man by Carl Goines

Sculptures of nudes, which grace public buildings and city squares around the world, mean different things to different people: to some they signify the beauty and dignity of the human body, the visible externalization of spirit, to others they remind of the sins of the flesh. The latter persistently try to remove any representation of nudes from public view claiming they are offended or that (against all evidence) children would be harmed by seeing a nude. Each person has a right to hold and express their beliefs, of course, but not the right to force those beliefs on a diverse contemporary public by dictating what public art is appropriate and what is not.


About Blog of the National Coalition Against Censorship

Blogging Censorship is where National Coalition Against Censorship staff weigh in on the censorship issues on their minds.
This entry was posted in Svetlana Mintcheva: Author and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Nude Sculpture Removed from Public View in Michigan

  1. david says:

    Since the “Walking Man” statue was removed , what would the anti art
    morons have to say about Michelangelo’s “David” ? No doubt they
    would want that removed too. So much for for narrow minded
    artistic illiterates and homophobics .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s