When teachers are criticized, principals mocked, is it “cyberbullying”?


The bulk of the cyber-bullying cases that have filled the courts have been cases of students punished for online speech with unpleasant content about teachers or administrators. On Monday, we looked at students using the internet to “bully” other students, and how difficult it is to build federal policy that protects students and protects student speech. Today, we’ll look at how student online speech about teachers and administrators can easily fall under the category of “cyber-bullying.” And how this designation makes it easier for schools to retaliate against student speech they find offensive.

It’s online, so it’s cyber, and it could be considered abusive, but is it bullying?
The term “cyber-bullying” is gaining traction, and its definition, as mentioned in yesterday’s post, is unclear. The cyber-bullying that the Berkman Institute report refers to is a cycle of communication in which the roles of young victims and perpetrators are blurry, as victims lash out and perpetrators are attacked. The application of the term “cyberbullying” to cases of students criticizing, mocking, or insulting teachers and administrators online is reactionary and inappropriate.

Punishment is real.
Justin Layshock (who created a fake Myspace account mocking his principal) “was suspended from high school, turned away from the University of Pennsylvania after first gaining early acceptance, and his family and the high school have been in litigation for several years. Avery Doninger was kicked off of student council (after calling administrators “douchebags” for cancelling an event). Katherine Evans was suspended, kicked out of AP classes, and has “cyberbullying” on her permanent record.

Why the punishment?
In coverage of the Katherine Evans case, a New York Times article quotes an administrator involved who says, “We don’t want teachers to work in fear, looking over their shoulders when they walk to their cars after school.” Howard Simon, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, in response, says “Since when did criticism of a teacher morph into assault?”

Vagueness (squared)
The vagueness of “cyberbullying” allows administrators to skirt the requirements of proving that students’ online speech is defamatory or libelous. As, well, everyone, has pointed out, the debate about whether student online speech is protected, is still up in the air.  This space gives frustrated school administrators opportunity to punish students with support from the courts.

One step in the right direction
The reality of the punishment, the overreach of the schools, the vagueness of the terminology all underscore the need for active protection of students’ speech rights. One good result of the Doninger case has been a Connecticut bill proposed by state Senator Gary D. LeBeau which would “prohibit school authorities from punishing students for the content of electronic correspondence transmitted outside of school facilities or with school equipment, provided that such content is not a threat to students, personnel, or the school.”

The law would create a “bright line” between the state and students’ online expression. As concern for cyberbullying grows, care must be taken in writing laws that closely define cyberbullying. In an article at SPLC, Kathleen Fitzgerald writes:

Ronald Collins of the First Amendment Center in Washington, D.C., said that although a lot of people use the phrase “cyber-bullying,” he is not sure as a legal matter what that means and how it is defined. If it is not defined very narrowly, it is almost sure to raise First Amendment problems, he said.

“Is there a difference between bullying and ranting? Is there a difference between bullying and harassment? Bullying and threats? … Unless the law is specifically and narrowly defined, it is an abstraction,” he said. “When abstractions become law, that is a formula for tyranny.”

Search popularity for the term "cyberbullying" 2004-the present

Search popularity for the term "cyberbullying" 2004-the present


About Blog of the National Coalition Against Censorship

Blogging Censorship is where National Coalition Against Censorship staff weigh in on the censorship issues on their minds.
This entry was posted in Sarah Falcon: Author and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to When teachers are criticized, principals mocked, is it “cyberbullying”?

  1. Mark says:

    I am in the business of education and have been teaching in the US and abroad for some time. I believe those educators and administrators who are bent on punishing students for speaking out are truly validating what those many students are saying. Rather than focus inward or even dealing with the real issues of education, it is instead a matter of course to silence critics and to render the First Amendment moot.

    I wonder if this blog can publish those stories that speak to how students have spoken out and not been crushed by the system. I am curious to learn how those educators and/or administrators involved responded.

  2. Pingback: Gossip Girl tackles cyberbullying « Blogging Censorship

  3. Donatus Anosike says:

    First of all, the cause of these outrageous predicaments is as a result of moral discipline. In today’s modern society, there is no way in any shape or form would high school authorities expect students to be disciplined, if suspension happens to be the only punishment that one has to face for disobeying the rules and regulations.
    Another thing to put into consideration is parental influence and social status. For instance, poverty impacts parental responsibility in the sense that it does not provide parents with the resources needed to bring up a child in a moral way. Also, broken relationships can affect a child in the sense that it makes that child to pick up habits that are good and bad because the parents are not there to caution them on their ways.

  4. Pingback: MXR Carbon Copy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s